Essay on severe disabilities
In contrast, the disabilities in the category of "other" in Table , which account for about 7 percent of the school-age population with disabilities and about 1 percent of the overall population, are much more likely to cause moderate or severe levels of impairment. These include the categories of autism,. Other than age, OSEP does not collect any demographic information from the states concerning students with disabilities.
The data that exist come from other sources. Most data on school-referred samples of children indicate that boys are identified for special education at higher rates than girls Heller et al. However, recent data using clinically identified samples of students suggest that approximately the same number of girls and boys are identified when functional characteristics are assessed e. Since the s, there have been concerns about higher proportions of minority children being identified as having disabilities, particularly for the category of mental retardation.
This concern about overrepresentation of minorities provoked numerous cases in which the federal courts scrutinized the professional practices of special educators and school psychologists, as well as the validity of IQ tests in making disability diagnoses see Morison et al. Table presents data from the , , and OCR surveys of school districts. These data should be viewed with an understanding that they are not a representative sample, do not use the same sampling methodology over time, and do not include all 13 IDEA categories.
Although the OCR sampling unit is the school district, OCR surveys are not a representative sample of school districts in the United States because the sampling includes all of the "large" districts and a sample of "smaller" districts. Furthermore, the OCR sampling strategy has changed over the surveys reported in Table , and it is impossible to determine with certainty the effects of these changes on the representativeness of the OCR results.
The most emphasis is placed on three "judgmental categories" mental retardation, specific learning disability, and serious emotional disturbance , that is, the categories in which a degree of professional judgment is required in diagnostic decision making Gelb and Mizokawa, NOTE: Data in the table represent the percentage of the total number of students in each ethnic minority group who are classified in the particular category given.
Department of Education , , Data across time suggest that, although overrepresentation of African American children in some categories still occurs, it has decreased in the past 20 years. Several trends regarding minority participation in special education are apparent from the data on African American, Hispanic, and white students presented in Table The most recent data suggest that patterns of disproportion vary by disability category. Hispanic children show the lowest rates of identification across all three mild disability categories. Most of the overrepresentation of African American children is due to the larger percentage labeled MMR, although African American children also show slightly higher rates of identification as SED.
Some analysts have argued that other variables, such as socioeconomic status and poverty status, which are confounded with race and ethnicity, may account for at least some of the variation in special education identification rates.
Dunn, It is rare, however, to find analyses and publication of data concerning the actual relationship of poverty to the incidence of disabilities and special education placement. Appropriate data for these analyses were available from four school districts Coalition to Save Our Children v. Board of Education et al. District Court, District of Delaware, Civil action no.
In all four districts, both African American and white students who were poor, as gauged by eligibility for subsidized school lunch, were much more likely to be classified as disabled and placed in special education. In three of the four districts, African American and white students in poverty circumstances had essentially the same rates of diagnosis for and placement in special education—about 19 percent on average.
Free Disabilities Essays and Papers
In the four districts, children who were not eligible for subsidized lunch were placed in special education at much lower rates—ranging from 7. Poverty is a plausible explanation for much of the special education overrepresentation of minority children, although additional studies are needed on the relationship of poverty to disability diagnosis and special education placement. Data from the NLTS, a longitudinal study of secondary school youth with disabilities, provides data on several socioeconomic and household characteristics.
Table presents some of these data as well as approximately comparable numbers for the general population Wagner et al.
People with Disabilities, Their Voices Heard Essay
These data suggest that students with disabilities are more socioeconomically disadvantaged than the general population—that is, more likely to come from single-parent households, to have a head of household with lower educational attainment, and to have lower household incomes. Having a disability, mild or severe, can affect a child's schooling in many ways. It can affect where children are educated, whether they have the same goals for schooling as children without disabilities, and whether they participate in all of the general education curriculum, some of it, or none.
Furthermore, it can influence whether they can be taught by the same methods and with the same tools and equipment as other students, and whether they can be evaluated in the same ways.
Many children with disabilities work toward the same high school diploma as other students, whereas some will seek a different credential or certificate of completion. Very little systematic, representative data exist that describe the range and degree to which students with disabilities participate in the various aspects of general education. In part this is because individualized programs are the hallmark of special education services, making it hard to collect and aggregate data systematically about the school experiences of these students.
In addition, re-. Youth with Disabilities a. Percentage of Youth in the General Population b. Bureau of Census Table 9, pp. Data refer to youth ages 12 to 17 and living with at least one parent in March Department of Education Percentage of households with youth ages 0 to 18 not youth ages 0 to 18 in households in Percent of youth ages in One analysis of major national education databases such as the National Assessment of Educational Progress and the National Education Longitudinal Study estimated that 40 to 50 percent of all school-age students with disabilities are excluded from these samples.
Furthermore, exclu-. In addition, the lack of consistent and reliable disability categories within and across studies makes it especially difficult to analyze how longitudinal pathways may vary by disability and to compare results from study to study McGrew et al. Among the important decisions made during the instructional planning and IEP development process are decisions about where the child will receive services.
Some children need special education services in only one or two academic skill areas e. For many children, then, placement decisions vary by skill or goal areas.
- introduction to thesis writing unsw!
- southwest airlines case study harvard;
- Students With Severe And Multiple Disabilities?
- bodies in motion and at rest essay!
Views about the optimal educational settings for children with various kinds of disabilities differ. Over the past several decades, policies have shifted regarding whether students with disabilities should be educated in special or regular classrooms.
crososreinten.tk Although since , the IDEA has required that each student with a disability be provided with a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment see Chapter 2 , for many students with disabilities, debate still continues over what the most appropriate placement is. In addition, it is important to remember that "regular education is not one setting but many different settings that vary considerably from one classroom to the next" Hebbeler, —3. Furthermore, where a child is placed is not necessarily related to what curriculum and instruction he or she receives.
- A Case Study Of People With Disabilities Social Work Essay.
- Popular Essays!
- Educating Special Needs Students and the Exceptional Learner;
- technical rationality essay;
- essay leisure activities.
- Friday essay: on telling the stories of characters with Down syndrome.
Data collected from all states for the —94 school year reported in Table indicate that over 95 percent of students with disabilities served under the IDEA were served in regular school buildings U. Department of Education, , a slight increase since , when data were first collected Sawyer et al.
The remaining 4. In a regular school building, students may receive services in one of several places: some are served largely in regular classrooms, others spend a significant part of their day in special education resource rooms, and still others spend the majority of their day in separate, self-contained special education classrooms.
Although the data are reported in very broad categories and by somewhat different methods, aggregated state child count data give a general national picture of current placement trends U. The intent of the placement data collected as required by Section of the IDEA is to assess the extent to which students with disabilities are being served with their peers without disabilities. Because of state-regulated data collections and specific service configurations used by states, some states crosswalk their placement data with the OSEP placement categories; as a result, despite extensive federal support and technical assistance, the placement data reported in the Annual Report to Congress are less reliable than is the total count of students receiving special education under the IDEA.
NOTE: Students age 6— Separate schools include separate day schools, residential facilities, and hospital or homebound programs. Children are counted as being served in a separate day school if they spend more than 50 percent of the school day there. This includes private facilities attended by students at public expense. Another 29 percent spent a substantial portion of their time in special education resource rooms, with the rest of their time spent in the regular classroom. About 43 percent of students with disabilities or about 2 million are classified as ''regular classroom" students—meaning that they spend at least 80 percent of their day there.
Many of this group of students are likely to be participating in the general education curriculum and in large-scale assessments, although perhaps with accommodations for both. Data presented in the table indicate that the amount of time spent in the regular classroom varies by disability. Students with autism, deaf-blindness,. Data also suggest that elementary school students ages 6—11 are more likely to be served for more time in regular classrooms than are secondary school students ages 12— Reflecting the national policy trend toward greater integration of students with disabilities into the least restrictive environment, placements in the regular education classrooms increased between —86 and —90 for almost all disabilities, and placements in resource rooms declined.
Placements of children in separate classrooms in regular school buildings remained essentially unchanged Sawyer et al. Concern over what happens to students with disabilities after they leave school has been growing since the mids. It began with the publication of a number of follow-up studies that documented the high unemployment and social isolation among former special education students Edgar et al. Contributing to the concern was a Harris poll indicating that unemployment among persons with disabilities was higher and wages lower than for any other group of working-age Americans Harris and Associates, Almost no nationally representative data were available at that time to examine the post-school outcomes of special education programs for students with various kinds of disabilities.
Reliable data on special education graduation and dropout rates are particularly difficult to obtain U. Department of Education, ; MacMillan et al. Problems with estimating dropout rates in general are well known; these problems are exacerbated in the case of special education by factors such as the different kinds of diplomas awarded special education students, the return of some portion of special education students to general education during any given year, the tendency of some special education students not to remain with their age or grade cohorts but rather to "age out" of school, and the tendency of others to drop out before ninth grade and never be counted in high school figures.
Because of these concerns, Congress directed the U. Department of Education to commission a study of "a sample of handicapped students, encompassing the full range of handicapping conditions, examining their educational progress while in special education and their occupational, educational, and independent living status after graduating from secondary school or otherwise leaving special education" P. The NLTS data collection began in with a sample of more than 8, youths with disabilities from more than school districts nationwide.
The sample consisted of special education students between the ages of 13 and 21 in the —86 school year.